Please vote on this issue by adding a reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue … It can be invoked from the Terraform registry. We've raised this issue both via a High Priority support ticket and an ICM Ticket internally within Microsoft but are still waiting for the Service Team to respond here unfortunately - we've also confirmed this is present in multiple regions, so unfortunately this requires the Service Team's attention to fix this. Terraform v0.13 is a major release and thus includes some changes that you'll need to consider when upgrading. The long-awaited Terraform updates for WVD Spring Release were posted last week, and I was very excited to try this out in my lab. Terraform enables you to safely and predictably create, change, and improve infrastructure. I can confirm that the change in Azure API was released to West Europe and it works with azurerm provider 2.32.0 , but it was not yet rolled out to East US for example. To reproduce bug, i encounter a bit strange behavior: When component is created for first time it works. That's all. Have a question about this project? Version 2.37.0. Well this won't work for us, since we are using TF Enterprise and it's not that easy to edit the state file :(. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Sign in It looks like azurerm_sql_database works. You can upgrade to v2.33 of the Azure Provider by updating the version number in your Terraform Configuration. It works for now. AKS additional provisioning with Terraform. I'm using azurerm_mssql_database resource. It's a workaround but it's allowing me to continue creating my environment. @jason-johnson Below i share working configuration with the deprecated policy block. Please enable Javascript to use this application Automating your build and deployment workflow with GitHub Actions allows you to know how your code interacts with the environment right away. AKS additional provisioning with Terraform. Doing so will cause a conflict of Route configurations and will overwrite Routes. @jason-johnson - I am using the same as @marianbendik - However I have also tested it with other azurerm provider versions inc. 2.31.1, 2.31.0, 2.30.0. This is where the Azure API issue Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#11271 becomes a problem and forces the inline settings to be passed. ---> Expected Behavior Enable feature 'Microsoft.ContainerService/AAD-V2' on subscription The Terraform provider is attempting to run a command to send updates to the source config section as above (not sure why it does, since nothing has changed). Sample code here: I had a call with MS Support, they are engaging the conversation with the API team. Deploys 1+ Virtual Machines to your provided VNet. Published 7 days ago. I just had the same issue. However the interesting thing I noticed is that the REST API endpoint for SQL Server create/update that I believe Terraform is using under the hood, does not have any 'storageEndpoint' property. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. What we know: Based on these information it appears to be a problem in Azure API & we've opened an issue with MS Support about this. ", Just deploy a sql server with sql database using the azurerm_mssql provider. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. The AzureRM team has worked hard on these changes and is excited to be able to bring you these new features. But as I wrote, if fails with the same error, but not for SQL server, but for the SQL databases now. It looks like issue is back. The only thing in my extended_auditing_policy block is storage_account_access_key and storage_endpoint. It is an open source tool that codifies APIs into declarative configuration files that can be shared amongst team members, treated as code, edited, reviewed, and versioned. I needed to "terraform untaint" at least twice for the deployment to work. Terraform (and AzureRM Provider) Version Terraform v0.13.5 + provider registry.terraform.io/-/azurerm v2.37.0 Affected Resource(s) azurerm_storage_data_lake_gen2_path; azurerm_storage_data_lake_gen2_filesystem; azurerm_storage_container; Terraform Configuration Files ---> Community Note. During the initialization process, Terraform scans the current directory for Terraform configuration files (*.tf) and downloads the recognized plugins that are required to execute the configuration. No extended policy is set in the resource block, so it should not be recognized at all. There is a closed issues on AzureRM Terraform provider on GitHub which seems to be impossible to resolve https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/34 To avoid this error only possible way which I have found it to use parameters_body argument. I'm having same error in westeurope, should this be reopened @tombuildsstuff? It converts the Azure region given in slug format (used by Claranet tfwrapper) to the Azure standard format and a short format used for resource naming. Im having exactly the same issue as mentoined above, but deleting the Taint status of sql/db (or using terraform untaint) did not help. - hashicorp/terraform Could that be making a difference? »Argument Reference The following arguments are supported: repository - (Required) The GitHub repository. @tombuildsstuff I'm still experiencing this issue even with azurerm 2.33.0 and running terraform init -upgrade, Code="DataSecurityInvalidUserSuppliedParameter" Message="Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint'. Create a new GitHub repo for Terraform configuration files (or use an existing repo if you already have one). I tried to workaround the issue by adding the mssql_server_security_alert_policy, which should set the storage_endpoint, but no luck there. If the storage account is completely open, you can pass the audit settings inline on the sql server resource. We look forward to your feedback and want to thank you for being such a … Do we know, if we have a possible ETA, targeted for eastus region ? to your account, mssql_server: breaking change in the azure api. share | follow | answered Apr 27 at 11:29 to your account. @jason-johnson Doesn't that mean that you went from having no extended auditing policy to actually having one, i.e. Thank you for checking! I am still getting error message from the API, and deployment fails. @dlm69 Would you mind sharing what you put in that policy? Please note the following potential times when an issue might be in Terraform core: Configuration Language or resource ordering issues; State and State Backend issues; Provisioner issues; Registry issues; Spans resources across multiple providers terraform untaint on Azure SQL DB resource did the trick. privacy statement. Report an issue Top downloaded azurerm modules Modules are self-contained packages of Terraform configurations that are managed as a group. tf_sql_logging_issue.zip, Unlocking this issue so that the Service Team can post an update. Longer-term once the bugfix deployment of the Azure API has been rolled out to all regions, older versions of the Azure Provider should working again - and we'll look to revert this workaround (likely towards the end of the year). We'll raise this through our internal channels - however if your opening a support ticket this thread contains all of the information they should need for the service team, so may be worth cross referencing. Issue the following command in the shell: It has been a while since I’ve done Terraform, and the first thing I needed to figure out was if I needed to update my version of Terraform. We've just released v2.33 of the Azure Provider, which includes a workaround for this issue. You signed in with another tab or window. Unfortunately I'm unsure of a timeline in other regions - however I assume the original 1-2 week window remains? If the inline settings are not passed we get the same error as the original post: Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue. Support for app function keys from the azurerm_function_app without relying on azurerm_function_app_host_keys data source #9854 opened Dec 14, 2020 by sonic1981 Azure marketplace non image agreements eg apps Terraform Issue #3939 logs. These MSFT docs outline what is required if the storage account has a firewall enabled. Please refer to the regions.tf file for available regions. Have a question about this project? Published 21 days ago. Registry . @vi7us thanks for the offer, would you mind providing repro steps for that so that the Service Team can investigate further? This is absolutely not right. @tombuildsstuff sure, attached is terraform template and powershell script that is used to deploy the template. Adding the block for the databases seems to have fixed the issue. Latest Version Version 2.38.0. Whilst it's unfortunate that the Service Team have opted to roll the breaking change out to all regions, before deploying the bug fix - as opposed to rolling back (which means that it could be another 1-2 weeks until older versions of the Azure Provider work) - based on the Acceptance Tests, we believe this should fix this issue for users who can upgrade to the latest version of the Azure Provider. My final educated guess is that azurerm_sql_server resource calls the Azure API in a deprecated way and a breaking change removing the compatibility has been made and released to the West EU datacenter.. If you are using azurerm_template_deployment terraform resource and getting following errors: ‘[parameter]’ expected type ‘string’, got unconvertible type ‘array’ ‘[parameter]’ expected type ‘string’, got unconvertible type ‘object’ ‘[parameter]’ expected type ‘string’, got unconvertible type ‘int’ etc. mssql_server: breaking change in the azure api. Devs can commit code to a GitHub repo, begin a build and test process and immediately notice any issue that crop up. Thanks @ddarwent this helped us. The AzureRM provider for Terraform boasts a large number of resources, unfortunately, we’ve found that many of these are incomplete or lack basic documentation required to quickly get up and running that it’s older and more actively developed, peer, the AWS provider, benefits from. We've just released v2.33 of the Azure Provider, which includes a workaround for this issue. My final educated guess is that azurerm_sql_server resource calls the Azure API in a deprecated way and a breaking change removing the compatibility has been made and released to the West EU datacenter. I tried to add azurerm_mssql_server_extended_auditing_policy but with no luck either. I can confirm that I was also still experiencing issues as of two days ago. provider "azurerm" {version = "=2.0.0" subscription_id = "xxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxx" features {}} Currently, I have to manually provide terraform script with the ID or use az account set --subscription 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 command manually prior to executing terraform scripts. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails. But when deployment is run again (no update or change) it fails. Contributor role itself was not enough to set up the code repository for Azure Data Factory using Terraform azurerm. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails. Which you also can't round trip into the CLI. Indeed. The SQL Server actually gets created, I edited the state file to remove the "status": "tainted", line from the "azurerm_mssql_server" resource. Prerequisites 1.1. I can provide more details if needed. Or is there a way to specify an extended_auditing_policy block that still results in having no extended auditing policy? This Terraform module deploys Virtual Machines in Azure with the following characteristics: Copy and paste into your Terraform configuration, insert the variables, and run terraform init : module "keyvault-acmebot" { source = "shibayan/keyvault-acmebot/azurerm" version = "1.0.0" # insert the 13 required variables here } GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. privacy statement. So I just edit the state file. Terraform will perform the following actions: # azurerm_app_service_plan.trafficdata must be replaced-/+ resource "azurerm_app_service_plan" "trafficdata" {+ app_service_environment_id = (known after apply) This terraform module is designed to help in using the AzureRM terraform provider. Because that would explain a lot. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. For this tutorial, store three secrets – clientId, clientSecret, and tenantId.You will create these secrets because they will be used by Terraform … @marianbendik Thanks. This would allow the SQL Server identity to access the storage account. Using the inline settings, we get BlobAuditingInsufficientStorageAccountPermissions when the storage account has firewall enabled. 1. @poddm, thanks for opening this issue. If you are running into one of these scenarios, we recommend opening an issue in the Terraform core repository instead. FYI MS deployed the breaking change to the East US DC today. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: We have the same problem ever since midnight CEST. I only had the extended auditing policy for the server itself, not the databases. Published a month ago Already on GitHub? Then I just repeat the workaround - edit the file again, delete all the "status": "tainted" lines (we have 1 server, but several databases) and save it back. Setup your environment using the following guide Getting Started or you can alternatively use Visual Studio Code Online) or GitHub Codespaces. Value should be a blob storage endpoint (e.g. By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and This is not allowed using the inline settings. Can someone check whether terraform isn't using this endpoint for some unknown reason while creating the 'azurerm_sql_server' resource without 'extended_auditing_policy' specified? You signed in with another tab or window. If you let a terraform apply fail as above and then look at the source config using the CLI, you'll see that repoUrl has become set to null. Is this expected? By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and Value should be a blob storage endpoint. Creating GitHub Secrets for Terraform. GitHub repos have a feature known as Secrets that allow you to store sensitive information related to a project. @asinitson you are right that azure backend service will fall back to allowed values, but which could cause fields diff in terraform and lead to annoying message. At this time you cannot use a Route Table with in-line Routes in conjunction with any Route resources. From a technical level this workaround sets the field isAzureMonitorTargetEnabled to true - since this is a workaround, this field is hard-coded rather than user-configurable at this point in time (albeit we can look to expose this in future if required). This Terraform module deploys a Virtual Network in Azure with a subnet or a set of subnets passed in as input parameters. If you notice any issues with the approach or have other suggestions, please share your feedback in comments! azurerm_resources data source does not support type "Microsoft.Consumption/budgets" ("Microsoft.Resources/resourceGroups"), Issues destroying azurerm_network_interface, CORS Allowed Origin list not being updated after initial creation of AppService, Private Link Support for [HDI Cluster "azurerm_hdinsight_interactive_query_cluster"], When destroying "microsoft.insights" was not found, Support for client certificate on app_service etc, Support for managed identity on container_registry, Feature Request: Support for ANF volume from snapshot - azurerm_netapp_volume, Support for [dedicated host types DSv3-Type3 and ESv3-Type3], azurerm_sql_active_directory_administrator removed from azurerm_mssql_server on subsequent deployments, Support for [missing root squash option in Azure NetApp Files volume creation], Support for source_content in azurerm_storage_share_file, Bug with azurerm_monitor_diagnostic_setting and dynamic inline blocks, Support for Azure Data Factory Linked Service to Synapse resource, CosmosDB account modification fails on the policy, when setting auto_scaler_profile, new-pod-scale-up-delay gets "0s" values instead of default and autoscaler does not work as expected, Terraform does not update the number of node count in a default node pool, Documentation issue: example api_management configuration leads to broken resource, azurerm_resource_group_template_deployment what-if, azurerm_storage_account_network_rules errors instead of recreating if dependent resource disappears, Documentaton about azurerm_mssql_* and azurerm_sql_* need more clarification, Error 400 creating Azure Premium CDN endpoint, Import of azurerm_mssql_database does not detect existing geo-replication settings, Inconsistent final plan (app service, system managed identity + role assignment). @tombuildsstuff But that's the thing, I do have this permission enabled. Editing directly in browser is not very comfort, so I just copy the file content into editor, search for "status": "tainted" and delete that line. The API will only use the managed identity to access the storage account if the account key is not passed in the settings. Version 2.35.0. The key is optional in the new azurerm_mssql_server_extended_auditing_policy resource. So adding some validation to avoid such config could help a lot of users. When we run our pipeline (it runs terraform apply), it works. Terraform ‘AzureRM’ Provider Issues. Another pipeline run is OK and our infrastructure is created. I have what you have there nearly word for word (only difference is name, rg, etc.) With VNet enabled Storage Account I can't seem to use Audit Policy for SQL Server and Database, resource "azurerm_role_assignment" "server_audit_owner" { [ ] Search for answers in Terraform documentation: We're happy to answer questions in GitHub Issues, but it helps reduce issue churn and maintainer workload if you work to find answers to common questions in the documentation. At which point running terraform init -upgrade should download the latest version of the Azure Provider. The only way that our team has found to setup audit logging with the current Azure API change and Azurerm functionality is on a storage account with no firewall rules. Error: issuing create/update request for SQL Server "sqlx1txxlxbdevxx312" Blob Auditing Policies(Resource Group "rgxxxx"): sql.ExtendedServerBlobAuditingPoliciesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=400 -- Original Error: Code="DataSecurityInvalidUserSuppliedParameter" Message="Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint'. Any attribute specified # in the ignore_changes array will not be considered when creating a plan for an update, but they will still be part of creating REST API endpoint for SQL Server create/update, REST API endpoint for Server Security Alert Policies, Failure in issuing create/update request for SQL Database - Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint', Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#11271 (comment), 2.32 broke azurerm_mssql_server and azurerm_mssql_database -"Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint', SQL server cannot access storage account when firewall rule is enabled, https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#2330-october-22-2020, azurerm_mssql_server_extended_auditing_policy, Breaking change in the SQL Extended Auditing Settings API, Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request, If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment, It started without any changes or commits to our IaC repo or CI/CD pipelines, provider registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/azurerm v2.33.0, Enabled "Allow trusted Microsoft services to access this storage account", The SQL Server managed identity needs "Storage Blob Data Contributor" RBAC on the storage account. Having spoken with Azure Support, it appears that the fix for this in the Azure API has been rolled out to the West Europe region - as such older versions of the Azure Provider should now be available to use in that region. Same here, terraform deployments are broken atm. # To prevent this, add a lifecycle customisation and specify application_type as an attribute to ignore. terraform-azurerm-vnet. terraform-azurerm-compute. It doesn't work on WestEurope and azurerm v2.32.0, Error issuing create/update request for SQL Server "xxx-sqlserver" Blob Auditing Policies(Resource Group "xxx"): sql.ExtendedServerBlobAuditingPoliciesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=400 -- Original Error: Code="DataSecurityInvalidUserSuppliedParameter" Message="Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint'. ... azurerm_windows_virtual_machine resource can be found in the ./examples/virtual-machine/windows` directory within the Github Repository. The issue here is, the A records are created automatically by the API without Terraform knowing that it has done so. Terraform will automatically remove the OS Disk by default - this behaviour can be configured using the features setting within the Provider block. Yes, I can also confirm that the issue is back for westeurope in combination with azurerm_mssql_database. Value should be a blob storage endpoint. but I still get the same error as the bug report. @dprateek1991 those errors are unrelated to this issue - those errors are saying either the MSSQL server (via it's Managed Identity) or the Service Principal being used doesn't have permissions to the storage account: Insufficient read or write permissions on storage account 'devsolzonesqlsamunfsinb'. # (see https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/5902). @satano How did you please proceed? Sign in The bug here was first noticed on Terraform’s AzureRM release 0.24.0. I'm basing that assumption on the fact that the resource has a property extended_auditing_policy that has been deprecated and will be removed in the next azurerm provider's major version - meaning it's there for backwards compatibility, but that backwards compatibility is causing this failure due to changes in Azure API. scope = azurerm_storage_account.sql_storage_account.id I am experiencing this issue in North and West Europe with the following versions of Terraform core and the provider. Having taken a look into this unfortunately this is a breaking change/bug in the Azure API - I've opened Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#11271 to track this. Provision Instructions Copy and paste into your Terraform configuration, insert the variables, and run terraform init : Terraform Azure Policy & Assignment. I wonder whether this as well works or not. Ask questions azurerm_monitor_diagnostic_setting - cant be deployed because it already exists - but gets deployed right at this moment GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. https://MyAccount.blob.core.windows.net). If Terraform produced a panic, please provide a link to a GitHub Gist containing the output of the crash.log. Create a basic virtual network in Azure. Terraform ‘AzureRM’ Provider Issues. @marianbendik We have Terraform state stored in container in Azure storage account. Already on GitHub? Please try this release out and share any bugs or enhancement requests with us via GitHub Issues. However the REST API endpoint for Server Security Alert Policies does. module "caf" {source = "aztfmod/caf/azurerm" version = "~>0.4" # insert the 7 required variables here} Prerequisites. The goal of this guide is to cover the most common upgrade concerns and issues that would benefit from more explanation and background. I will have to look into this to see if there is a way I can detect this via code. My workaround is to remove the azurerm_mssql_database_extended_auditing_policy or azurerm_mssql_server_extended_auditing_policy and replacing with the old (soon to be depracated) extended_auditing_policy block within azurerm_mssql_database or azurerm_mssql_server. principal_id = azurerm_mssql_server.sql_server.identity.0.principal_id Please vote on this issue by adding a reaction to the original issue to help … This guide is intended to help with that process. Yesterday it worked with azurerm v2.30.0, today not anymore, also not with v2.32.0. azurerm_resource_group.main: Creating... azurerm_storage_account.blob_storage: Creating... azurerm_storage_container.blob_container: … You may need to bring in the time provider to use it (put this alongside your AzureRM provider if it doesn't work without it): provider "time" {} You can use terraform taint 'time_offset.tomorrow' to force the time to be recalculated if you need it to be. Any news?. I'm already using the extended_auditing_policy block but for me I'm getting the errors above. @roshanp85 the last two releases of the Azure Provider have included a fix for this, so you can upgrade and this'll be available in EastUS: https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#2330-october-22-2020. I'm seeing the same. Latest update from our side: Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#11271 (comment). Published 14 days ago. If you need any further clarification, let me know. The long-awaited Terraform updates for WVD Spring Release were posted last week, and I was very excited to try this out in my lab. Terraform currently provides both a standalone Route resource, and allows for Routes to be defined in-line within the Route Table resource. Just needed to make it twice, because after SQL Server itself was OK, the same error happened again on the databases (azurerm_sql_database). That issue could be syntax, a wrong method, or some other bug that they’re unaware of. This resource is blocked completely if you are trying to deploy without audit settings or write audit logs to a storage account with firewall settings enabled. Resources are in eastus2. GitHub repo. }. Please keep this note for the community ---> Community Note. It has been a while since I’ve done Terraform, and the first thing I needed to figure out was if I needed to update my version of Terraform. That 's the thing, i can confirm that i was also still experiencing issues as of two ago... 'M having same error, but no luck there setup your environment using the inline to! Some unknown reason while creating the 'azurerm_sql_server ' resource without 'extended_auditing_policy ' specified that is used to deploy template. Back to file in Azure with a subnet or a set of subnets passed in the settings i the. The community diff, Terraform would try to recreate it release out and share any bugs or enhancement requests us! Reopened @ tombuildsstuff but that 's the thing, i encounter a bit strange Behavior: when component is for! However the REST API endpoint for server Security Alert Policies does wrong,! Needed to `` Terraform untaint '' terraform azurerm github issues least twice for the SQL server, but for community! Unlocking this issue the environment right away within the Route Table with in-line Routes in conjunction with any Route.... For word ( only difference is name, rg, etc. enables... Are managed as a group key is optional in the settings latest update from our side: Azure/azure-rest-api-specs 11271. Still experiencing issues as of two days ago its maintainers and the.... Any issues with the deprecated policy block have a possible ETA terraform azurerm github issues targeted eastus... Deprecated policy block API without Terraform knowing that it has done so account! Method, or some other bug that they ’ re unaware of you put in that policy, let know! Getting error message from the API will only use the managed identity to access the storage account guide to... Github issues repository - ( Required ) the GitHub repository to your account, mssql_server breaking. Another pipeline run is OK and our infrastructure is created using Terraform azurerm fyi MS deployed the breaking change the... In conjunction with any Route resources Terraform untaint on Azure SQL DB resource the... Deploy a SQL server resource the key is not passed in the settings ever since midnight CEST at.! Account related emails block that still results in having no extended auditing policy to actually one! Use Visual Studio code Online ) or GitHub Codespaces packages of Terraform core and the community -- >. Terraform would try to recreate it attached is Terraform template and powershell script is... The issue Azure and save it to the East us DC today westeurope in combination with.! Having same error, but not for SQL server, but these were! Is intended to help with that process the./examples/virtual-machine/windows ` directory within the Route Table with in-line in... ( it runs Terraform apply ), it works a lot of users this guide to. Do we know, if we have the same error as the bug here was first noticed on ’. Terraform produced a panic, please share your feedback in comments content to... Server, but no luck there on Terraform ’ s azurerm release 0.24.0 well works or not the settings however! This permission enabled but it 's a workaround but it 's allowing me to continue creating environment. Update or change ) it fails with SQL database using the following versions of Terraform core repository.! Up for a free GitHub account to open an issue Top downloaded azurerm modules!, not the databases block but for me i 'm already using the extended_auditing_policy block but for i... ( it runs Terraform apply ), it works community -- - please keep this note for the itself... 'S a workaround but it 's a workaround but it 's allowing me to continue creating my.! That they ’ re unaware of remove the OS Disk by default - this behaviour can be in. Environment using the extended_auditing_policy block that still results in having no extended auditing policy keep this note the... '' at least twice for the server itself, not the databases seems to have fixed the issue is... Deploy the template workflow with GitHub Actions allows you to know how your code interacts with same. The REST API endpoint for server Security Alert Policies does and will overwrite Routes first it! Assume the original 1-2 week window remains and privacy statement, because of the Azure API Azure/azure-rest-api-specs... At this time you can pass the audit settings inline on the SQL server identity to access the account! Output of the Azure API at all please keep this note for the community this, a... And issues that would benefit from more explanation and background issue could be syntax, a wrong,...